🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our children's youth". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," commented the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the regional government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this global debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers show that policymakers internationally are no longer content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.